DarkTwinCities.com

Skulls, Bones and Unicorns

electronic music “live” part 1

June 22nd, 2009 by P_machine

One of the most controversial topics, that many people want to weigh-in on these days, is the unplugged-keyboard factor. While many will say that it’s not a big deal, there seems something a bit odd about that logic. If a band is playing un-plugged, it’s typically brought to the level of conspiracy — all parties involved that know are sworn to secrecy. But surfing myspace, a keen eye can find many incriminating pictures of bands playing without a power cable, laptops with no visible sound cards, or the ominous usb-cable-to-nowhere.

Before I proceed any further, I’d like to point to another similar phenomenon that I saw/heard back when I listened to “guitar music”. In my early teen years, I use to buy these things called “imports” (ie. bootlegs of bands playing live). I often times noticed that some recording didn’t differ from place-to-place: same set-list, same encore, same unimaginative crowd shout-outs, and almost no variation in music. At that point, I’m really not clear on what the difference would be of a band playing live or clicking play.

You hear many excuses for the un-plugged equipment: it sounds bad live, can’t be played live, too expensive to haul around equipment, and (maybe the most interesting/provocative defense) ‘what’s the difference.’ What really is the difference for you?

I’ve seen highly innovative live set-ups, which involve multiple people pretending to play. What I really wonder about is – why? I’m aware of the fact that when things are actually done live, people complain (a very long time ago, I saw Decoded Feedback play with a very talented live drummer, and while I thought it sounded great, it didn’t have the smoothness that sometimes is demanded of electronic music). But there just seems something painfully deceptive in a karaoke act, but I would argue that it’s no different then a highly talented band repeating verbatim what they did the night before.

Though a new paradigm that’s emerging in electronic music, is the person performing on-stage has a hell of a lot more fun then anyone witnessing it (this is also the case with most DJs). I’ve seen/heard some amazing improvisation done with Ableton, but it’s really boring to watch (see Edgey).

This gets to a somewhat-interesting but a bit dated discussion on the original vs. copy in art. I don’t really feel like going into it, but you can read this historic essay.

4 Responses

  1. rskm1

    I think performers have an obligation to “perform”, in the sense of “adding something to the concertgoing experience that you couldn’t get in your car or on the couch with an iPod.”

    But I don’t really care whether what they’re “doing” onstage is making any SOUND or not.

    It just seems like musician snobbery to me. Would you lambast a roofing contractor for using an electric nailgun instead of pounding each one in with a hammer? Why should MUSICIANS have to do everything manually, over and over again?

    It’s not like they’re plagiarizing someone ELSE’S work. (e.g. Milli Vanilli)

  2. rskm1

    Oh yeah, and the racket produced by that live drummer they had at the last RazedBlack show singlehandedly RUINED the whole show…

  3. rskm1

    ^Razed<in>Black, that is.

  4. crunchpod

    If you’re playing a softsynth VST with a midi controller live, you can pretty much get by running a 1/8″ to dual 1/4″ cable into a DI and not need an external sound card. Just because you don’t see a breakout box doesn’t mean there isn’t sound coming out of a laptop… just sayin’.

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.