View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Dec 11, 2019 4:41 am



Reply to topic  [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Okay, so, cigarettes. 
Author Message
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
alisgray wrote:
In any case, I see that you didn't actually read that short and not particularly challenging article. Go chase yourself. I'm sure the rest of your opinions are just as carefully constructed as your research methods.


Nah, I don't engage in cut n' paste arguments with people. People who think they can post a wikipedia page to make their arguments for them annoy me. I find it lazy and it usually indicates someone who doesn't know what they are talking about. In this case, whether or not bread has yeast in it is off-topic so it's really just a method for you to draw attention away from the real discussion (which you gave up on). Y'all can sit here and talk about bread and my spelling all you want, but it won't make what you are saying any less wrong.

~E~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Tue Mar 10, 2009 4:57 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 5056
Post 
We really don't have to make what you're saying less wrong. You're doing a fine job of it on your own, sir.


Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:02 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
devil wrote:
We really don't have to make what you're saying less wrong. You're doing a fine job of it on your own, sir.



Um, yeah. Glad we agree. Thank you for being big enough to admit that.

~Ether~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:03 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:21 pm
Posts: 2036
Location: not on this site. contact me elsewhere.
Post 
...that's an remarkably subtle technique, devil. nice.

Ether, dear, you brought up the bread and leavening question. Wikipedia still is more effort than you have put into defending the questionable logic and information I caught you out on. Go on, if your standards are so much higher for research, show me what your sources are. Don't you see how dumb it is to say that "it's not communion unless you do it the oldest way" but that "cigarettes are a modern use of the Native tobacco ritual"?

I am trying to say this in easy, small words for your benefit, since you seem to have trouble following me.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 1:22 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
alisgray wrote:
...that's an remarkably subtle technique, devil. nice.

Ether, dear, you brought up the bread and leavening question. Wikipedia still is more effort than you have put into defending the questionable logic and information I caught you out on. Go on, if your standards are so much higher for research, show me what your sources are. Don't you see how dumb it is to say that "it's not communion unless you do it the oldest way" but that "cigarettes are a modern use of the Native tobacco ritual"?

I am trying to say this in easy, small words for your benefit, since you seem to have trouble following me.


Pookie-kins,

I'll put this in simple terms for your benefit- it's a tangent. I don't care about bread used in ritual. If your tie-in is that eating this Jesus bread is also a ritual, then so be it. If it's a bad comparison, so be it. Either way, nitpicking the origins of eating bread as a spiritual ritual is not important to this discussion.

The larger point is that humans have been burning leaves and inhaling the fumes since ancient times. We like to make a lot of this cigarette stuff as being a corporate thing and a commercial thing and a health thing- but smoking is actually also an ancient tradition that humanity has participated in for many thousands of years. No respect is paid to it's history, and that history puts the argument in the correct context where it belongs. When the history of humankind's enjoyment of burning leaves is omitted, and the question of freedom to live your life as you wish is omitted- then the issue becomes a witch hunt. It becomes people who don't use the product forcing their will on to people who do under the banner of righteousness and health conciousness.

And that..... is the point.

~E~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Thu Mar 12, 2009 2:25 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post 
Ether wrote:
The larger point is that humans have been burning leaves and inhaling the fumes since ancient times.
Yeah, ignorant people in the past did LOTS of stupid unhealthy shit. What's so special about smoking again?

Ether wrote:
We like to make a lot of this cigarette stuff as being a corporate thing and a commercial thing and a health thing-
No we don't. But the big corporations do.

Ether wrote:
but smoking is actually also an ancient tradition that humanity has participated in for many thousands of years. No respect is paid to it's history, and that history puts the argument in the correct context where it belongs. When the history of humankind's enjoyment of burning leaves is omitted, and the question of freedom to live your life as you wish is omitted- then the issue becomes a witch hunt. It becomes people who don't use the product forcing their will on to people who do under the banner of righteousness and health conciousness.
I'd make the exact same argument, except replace "smoking" with "chickenfucking". Maybe that should be a separate thread, though.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:12 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:47 pm
Posts: 701
Location: the rotted glory of minneapolis suburbia
Post 
Wait, so why would it be ok to allow smoking wherever you want? Wouldn't that be a smoker forcing *their* will upon all the others sharing that indoor space too? All history and corporate bull aside, a smoker exercising their choice to smoke does more harm than a non-smoker exercising their biological need to breathe clean air.

_________________
Art is life. But life is not art.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:48 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post 
smoking should only be allowed in oxygen-rich neonatal care units.

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Thu Mar 12, 2009 3:58 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
manna_panna wrote:
Wait, so why would it be ok to allow smoking wherever you want? Wouldn't that be a smoker forcing *their* will upon all the others sharing that indoor space too? All history and corporate bull aside, a smoker exercising their choice to smoke does more harm than a non-smoker exercising their biological need to breathe clean air.


I didn't say that. What are you even talking about? News flash- smokers can't smoke indoors in public. As I said before, the anti-smoking people have already won the war. They got what they wanted, and now they are going for even more beyond what is fair and just (more on that in a moment). In most states you can not smoke inside public places. In every state, it is illegal to smoke in a government building.

You'd think the anti-smoking people would be satisfied with their win, pat themselves on the back and admire what great work they've done. But no, this thing is a long way from over. They will chip away at our individual liberties until there are none.

Many places do not allow smoking within x number of feet of an entrance to a public building and that is being pushed hard by these people. They are also trying to push through a ban on smoking while driving with kids in the car. After they get that passed, they can get a ban on smoking with a passenger in a car of any age. After they win that battle, they'll go on to ban smoking in cars entirely. Then you won't be able to smoke on a bicycle... then, while walking down the sidewalk. And it won't end there. These people love to complain, and as long as they keep punishing and not banning the practice of smoking- they have ammo to b*tch and complain for many years to come. They also love their personal pet projects and even though smoking is evil they have no trouble taking money from smokers to fund these projects. They will tax and penalize and charge their way to funding while they demonize the smokers.

You should be able to smoke outside. Outside air belongs to everybody and this self-righteous tirade about trying to control the air we breathe has gone too far. I can handle no smoking in government buildings- that makes sense and is fair. As for privately-owned businesses, it should be up to the business owner to decide. Then the clientele can decide if that is an environment they want to patronize. Everyone has decisions, everyone is empowered, and nobody loses.

Lastly, nobody has EVER forced me to walk through their smoke. I've always had the option to step around them, cross the street to get by then, hold my breath for the 1 second it takes me to walk past them, avoid them, wear a mask/oxygen tank/spacesuit, or just not hang out with them. This crap about how non-smokers are 'forced' to breath other people's air is ridiculous. And for that matter, nobody ever said you have a RIGHT to breathe perfect, clean air. There is no place in the constitution that talks about how you are entitled to breathe pristine air.

~E~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Thu Mar 12, 2009 4:34 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:21 pm
Posts: 2036
Location: not on this site. contact me elsewhere.
Post 
Witch hunts, the real ones, <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7935048.stm">still happen</a> <a href="http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/03/01/2504141.htm">today actually</a>, though they're considered outrageously barbaric and tragic by most of the world. Another ironic example of ritual versus the greater good. The "medicines" those guys are making out of the body pieces of their innocent victims is super traditional.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:30 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:47 pm
Posts: 701
Location: the rotted glory of minneapolis suburbia
Post 
You're being an alarmist. This "slippery slope" scenario you present is silly. Get a grip! It's not as if lawmakers and lobbyists sit around and think, "Who shall we pick on? Wait! It's cool to ban smokers! Let's restrict all the things they like to do!" Watch out, coffee and porn is next. /sarcasm

A no-smoking radius around doorways keeps the smoke from being drawn inside by the exit/enter air exchange. Banning smoking in a car with children protects the children. Kids with smokers in their family are more susceptible to ear and breathing problems and are more likely to become smokers themselves. They are pre-addicted, and nobody asks them if that is *their* choice, now do they?
These are logical regulations that lessen the exposure of harmful chemicals to the unwilling/underaged. I highly doubt they are gateway laws into banning your freedom to poison yourself entirely.

I do agree that the owner of certain establishments (i.e. entertainment, food, liquor) should have an option to allow smoking in their business if they wish. Then they would ultimately be responsible for their profit/loss due to that choice. But seeing as how *everybody* is getting gov't handouts these days, they'd probably whine about no matter which option they took.

Quote:
"...And for that matter, nobody ever said you have a RIGHT to breathe perfect, clean air. There is no place in the constitution that talks about how you are entitled to breathe pristine air."


This argument is ridiculous, and I will not revisit it after this statement: There is no place in the constitution that talks about my right to be left-handed, my right to be awake or my right to eat food. <b>Because--like breathing normal air--they are all natural functions of the body</b>.

_________________
Art is life. But life is not art.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 5:45 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:48 pm
Posts: 211
Location: MN
Post 
This may be a bit off topic.... [warning!]
but have you noticed the over reliance on fog machines to augment light displays at concerts and children's magic/puppet shows has increased significantly since the smoking ban?
whee oooh. That stuff is pretty dang funky in large doses. :o

Since I'm obviously late to the party I'll throw in a couple more non-sequitors (sp?) for good measure:

1:Has anyone here smoked a full tray of communion wafers before?
2:If you have, do you see God or just the Virgin Mary?
3:Why do they call them "cling peaches" if they don't really cling to anything?

wow, I've been gone for far too long. :wink: haha

_________________
.:OBCT:.||.:betaEight:.||.:Portfolio:.||.:AlkaloidHouse:.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:11 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 2488
Post 
Image


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:17 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:48 pm
Posts: 211
Location: MN
Post 
:lol:
smoke gets in your eyes.
Image

_________________
.:OBCT:.||.:betaEight:.||.:Portfolio:.||.:AlkaloidHouse:.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:25 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post 
Ether wrote:
Many places do not allow smoking within x number of feet of an entrance to a public building and that is being pushed hard by these people. They are also trying to push through a ban on smoking while driving with kids in the car. After they get that passed, they can get a ban on smoking with a passenger in a car of any age. After they win that battle, they'll go on to ban smoking in cars entirely. Then you won't be able to smoke on a bicycle... then, while walking down the sidewalk. And it won't end there. These people love to complain, and as long as they keep punishing and not banning the practice of smoking- they have ammo to b*tch and complain for many years to come. They also love their personal pet projects and even though smoking is evil they have no trouble taking money from smokers to fund these projects. They will tax and penalize and charge their way to funding while they demonize the smokers.

OMFG AND EVENTUALLY I WON'T BE ABLE TO FUCK CHICKENS EVEN IN THE PRIVACY OF MY OWN HOME!!


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:26 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:48 pm
Posts: 211
Location: MN
Post 
Image
no sweat, i think the egg man has arrived.

_________________
.:OBCT:.||.:betaEight:.||.:Portfolio:.||.:AlkaloidHouse:.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:30 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:21 pm
Posts: 2036
Location: not on this site. contact me elsewhere.
Post 
boot: the smoke machines plague me. not as much as lit freaking cigarettes wielded by drunks on the dance floor, though. stupid asthma.


Thu Mar 12, 2009 6:48 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 2488
Post 
Image


Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:05 pm
Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 20, 2004 9:21 pm
Posts: 2036
Location: not on this site. contact me elsewhere.
Post 
(also, my trivia-tastic network of spies says that "Cling peaches" is a market name related to free-stone peach breeding. that is, cling peaches are the original style where the fruit clings to the stone.)


Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:09 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post 
Klink Peaches? Was ist?
Image


Thu Mar 12, 2009 7:35 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2003 4:12 pm
Posts: 4274
Location: pyramids of mars
Post 
boot wrote:
3:Why do they call them "cling peaches" if they don't really cling to anything?


you're not throwing them hard enough.

or, you know, what Alis said.

_________________
Rockula! wrote:
Whooda thought that you could get supress a guy's urge kick someones ass by waving pussy in his face?


Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:10 am
Profile YIM
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
manna_panna wrote:
You're being an alarmist. This "slippery slope" scenario you present is silly. Get a grip! It's not as if lawmakers and lobbyists sit around and think, "Who shall we pick on? Wait! It's cool to ban smokers! Let's restrict all the things they like to do!" Watch out, coffee and porn is next. /sarcasm



You know, you're right. There is no way politicians would take a popular position and exploit it to further their own agendas. They certainly wouldn't even dream of demonizing an opposing position to advance their cause. I can't believe I even suggested such a thing! And lobbyists certainly wouldn't try to pressure, convince, cajole, influence, bribe, or wine & dine politicians to get their way. They are noble folks who just want what's best for the country, even if that doesn't happen to be what they personally want. I didn't realize what an alarmist I was being, and I apologize.

~Ether~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Fri Mar 13, 2009 3:04 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:47 pm
Posts: 701
Location: the rotted glory of minneapolis suburbia
Post 
Don't lie about being sorry. My political views are nowhere as altruistic as you seem to be so desperate to interpret them. I don't even need to argue my point with you anymore; you just twist my words into some extreme P.O.V. that you'd rather argue against. So have at it. What do I say next?

_________________
Art is life. But life is not art.


Fri Mar 13, 2009 4:53 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post 
manna_panna wrote:
You're being an alarmist. This "slippery slope" scenario you present is silly. Get a grip! It's not as if lawmakers and lobbyists sit around and think, "Who shall we pick on? Wait! It's cool to ban smokers! Let's restrict all the things they like to do!" Watch out, coffee and porn is next. /sarcasm


What planet do you live on?
That's all that lawmakers and lobyists do
Especially when it comes to porn and the selective enforcement of local laws that get certain people's names in the news
You may not have it as severe up there in Liberal Minnesotah but i know people here in dallas who work at porn shops who
either quit or take a vacation during elections because the sherriffs are all out "crackin' down on filth"
All of that creates lots of fines and kickbacks to keep shops open

As far as smoking goes,
How much revenue do you think gets generated by smoking bans?
It sure as fuck 'aint going in the direction of the business owner
Unless, you own a business that is connected with the construction/conversion or the enforcement of smoking bans
Not to mention the revenue from fines

Anyone who thinks that the government
ANY GOVERNMENT
is looking out for their own best interests
is deluding themselves

You may see some true blue public servants out there but the important shit gets decided by where the money goes and where the public attention gets directed
90% of the time, public attention is directed in an opposite direction from where the money goes

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Fri Mar 13, 2009 5:11 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
manna_panna wrote:
Don't lie about being sorry. My political views are nowhere as altruistic as you seem to be so desperate to interpret them. I don't even need to argue my point with you anymore; you just twist my words into some extreme P.O.V. that you'd rather argue against. So have at it. What do I say next?



All you need to say now is that you are wrong, accept my genius, and then thank me for enlightening you.

And please, do stop arguing. It's pointless and you're not very good at it. I'm all for a spirited debate, but if you are just going to be argumentative because you can't admit when you're wrong then this gets boring real fast.

~Ether~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Fri Mar 20, 2009 5:17 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:47 pm
Posts: 701
Location: the rotted glory of minneapolis suburbia
Post 
Ha. I was thinking the exact thing about you. You're tiresome, delusional and self-righteous. Whiny and repetitive. And *that's* why I'm done arguing with you.

_________________
Art is life. But life is not art.


Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:07 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post 
i love the irony when someone says "i'm done arguing with you."

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:20 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 57
Location: eXistenZ, Level VI
Post 
I love smoking. Fucking love it. I've been smoking since I was 13 and smokes were 60c a pack, available to anyone who had a note from (heh heh) their parents.

I quit heroin 20 years or so ago now. Ditto cocaine. Don't miss 'em much at all these days.

I quit smoking for a year once, and it was the most miserable year of my life. I wanted a smoke every minute of every day. After that year, I was told I had to quit drinking, thanks to my liver. So, I quit drinking and started smoking again -- and I was the happiest non-drinker you've ever seen.

The second hand smoke shit is a scam. Follow the science. The first EPA report was so flawed it was repudiated -- but it's still the one that gets tossed around. "30,000 people die every year from secondhand smoke." Wow. Name one. One.

That figure came from attributing every case of lung cancer in a non-smoker as resulting from secondhand smoke. I bet the asbestos lawyers are still pissed about that one.

Here's how insane the non-smoking advocates have become: Here in Minnesota, they're considering a law which would ban smoking in your own car if there are children in it.

Yeah. Perfect sense. Keep the kids away from smoke, while you ferry them around in a vehicle more likely to kill them than anything else. "Warning: Cigarette Smoke Contains Carbon Monoxide." Wow. Scary. That must be why so many people kill themselves by shutting their garage doors, getting inside their cars, and having a smoke.

Speaking of the kids, smokers have dropped from about 50% of the population to 25%. In that same time, childhood asthma rates have nearly doubled. Explanation please.


Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:48 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 3:02 pm
Posts: 1893
Location: Minneapolis
Post 
Quote:
WASHINGTON, March 4 -- Congress is a step closer to giving the FDA regulatory power over tobacco products -- something public health groups have been pushing since the 1970s.

A bill approved 39 to 13 by the House Energy and Commerce Committee Wednesday during a contentious mark-up session would authorize the FDA to regulate labeling, marketing, transport, and sale of tobacco products.

It would not permit the agency to ban tobacco products entirely, but the FDA could require the removal of harmful additives from cigarettes and even reduce the nicotine in cigarettes to just short of zero.

The FDA would also be able to prohibit companies from advertising their products in ways that appeal to kids -- such as by adding clove or vanilla flavors -- or labeling their smokes as "light" or "low tar," or with other phrases suggesting a healthier cigarette.

The bill, sponsored by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), sailed through the House last year but stalled in the Senate as the clock ran down on the 110th Congress. Former President Bush opposed the bill then, but President Barack Obama, who has struggled to quit smoking, supports the bill.

Waxman had said the tobacco bill would be among his early priorities during this Congress, and cemented that pledge when his committee approved the bill today and sent it to the full House.

But Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) said the Senate remains the obstacle to final passage.

Several Republican committee members who oppose the bill pointed to an already strained FDA that they say is failing its food and drug safety mission.

"I'm cautious of the FDA's ability to have the necessary staff and money to carry out the regulation of tobacco in every town, city, and state in America," said Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.).

"Clearly this is erroneous," Dingell responded, who pointed out the bill would collect user fees from tobacco companies to fund the FDA's added tobacco responsibilities.

Republicans favored a substitute bill that would place control of tobacco in the hands of a new agency outside the FDA, but within the Department of Health and Human Services.

After that amendment was flatly rejected by Democrats, more than a dozen other GOP amendments were voted down.

Nevertheless, six of the committee's 23 Republicans voted to move the bill forward. No Democrats opposed it.

Rep. Michael Burgess, M.D. (R-Texas), an obstetrician-gynecologist, said if the Democrats really cared about public health, they would give the FDA full authority to ban cigarettes, rather than just the discretion to require companies to adjust nicotine levels. The bill would not allow the FDA to completely eliminate nicotine from cigarettes, however.

"If our true goal is to limit the public health exposure to cigarette smoke then we would take away the thing that makes the cigarette addictive," Dr. Burgess said. "If our goal is simply to collect more tax dollars from cigarette companies, then let's be honest about what we're doing," he said.

Committee Republicans accused Waxman of pushing an "abstinence-only" tobacco bill that could place restrictions on all types of tobacco products without taking into account that some might carry a comparatively lower health risk.

The bill applies the same standards to cigarettes and smokeless tobacco products, such as lozenges, which can be a less harmful alternative to smoking, said Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.).

But Democrats including Waxman and Frank Pallone (D-N.J.) said Congress shouldn't support legislation that gives any sort of pass to smokeless tobacco, which is highly carcinogenic. (See: Smokeless Tobacco Called Unsafe Cigarette Substitute)

Waxman said his bill would give the FDA discretion to allow companies to market their product if independent scientific evidence confirms they make a healthier alternative to cigarettes.

Philip Morris USA, the nation's largest tobacco manufacturer, supports the legislation and has said that it could spur competition among cigarette companies to see who could produce the least harmful tobacco products.

But smaller tobacco companies oppose the bill and have said it would just boost Philip Morris' market share because it requires cigarette companies to carry out expensive research and restricts new competitors from entering the market.

Joel Nitzkin, M.D., a public health physician, and chairman of the tobacco control task force with for the American Association of Public Health Physicians, said the cigarette giant Phillip Morris has lobbied tirelessly for a bill that would favor them.

Dr. Nitzkin said that Waxman realizes that without support from the powerful cigarette company, the bill never would pass.

Waxman declined to comment except to say, "Phillip Morris supports it for its own reasons."

The American Lung Association, which has lobbied for years for the bill, along with the American Cancer Society and the American Heart Association, lauded the committee's approval of the bill.

"FDA authority over manufactured tobacco products will finally allow our nation to begin to take significant steps to reduce the tobacco-caused death toll that claims 442,000 lives each year and results in $193 billion annually in healthcare costs and lost productivity," American Lung Association president and CEO Charles D. Connor said in a release.



http://www.medpagetoday.com/Washing...ton-Watch/13126

_________________
DJ Nitrogen

Playlists


Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:46 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
manna_panna wrote:
Ha. I was thinking the exact thing about you. You're tiresome, delusional and self-righteous. Whiny and repetitive. And *that's* why I'm done arguing with you.


Oh, snap!

~E~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Mon Mar 23, 2009 12:59 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 57
Location: eXistenZ, Level VI
Post 
Quote:
"FDA authority over manufactured tobacco products will finally allow our nation to begin to take significant steps to reduce the tobacco-caused death toll that claims 442,000 lives each year and results in $193 billion annually in healthcare costs and lost productivity," American Lung Association president and CEO Charles D. Connor said in a release.


Also note that that roughly "440,000 deaths a year" number hasn't changed since cigarette smoking has been drastically reduced.


Mon Mar 23, 2009 1:14 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post 
SicTim wrote:
Also note that that roughly "440,000 deaths a year" number hasn't changed since cigarette smoking has been drastically reduced.
SO?

Looks like the 442K figure was released by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2002:
Annual Smoking-Attributable Mortality, United States, 1995-1999
Cancer 155,761
Cardiovascular disease 148,605
Respiratory conditions 98,007
Perinatal conditions 1,006
Burn deaths 966
Secondhand smoke deaths 38,053
Total 442,398

It's 10 years later, and you're claiming the number has gone down.
Well? What's the figure now, Mr. Brilliant Statistical Insights?
Is it down to 220,000 people a year now? Under 100,000?
More importantly: SO WHAT?


Mon Mar 23, 2009 3:42 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 57
Location: eXistenZ, Level VI
Post 
You seem to be making my exact point: The number hasn't changed in ten years, despite a sharp decrease in the number of smokers.

"So what?" is that statistics are the easiest way to lie.

Remember, these are the same government agencies that say smoking pot will cause you to flip out and shoot your little brother in the head.

Here's the CDC page with the statistics for 2008 -- including that never-changing 440,000 deaths per year number: moral panic.

Also, note that the figure for obesity-related deaths sticks at about 400,000 per year, which is close enough to make the extra 40,000 seem like quibbling.


Fri Mar 27, 2009 8:40 am
Profile WWW

Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:01 am
Posts: 17
Post 
I wouldn't expect the number to show a significant drop so quickly, given that the damage caused by smoking may not be evident for years to decades after the initial harm has been done.

_________________
"I really like the butt, especially when they're handcuffed."


Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:49 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post 
Ok, here's a cut n' paste argument for you!

Forget smoking- the real danger is PETS! We need to ban pets ASAP!

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/03/27/fa ... index.html

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:08 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post 
At least Lassie could go get help after she'd pushed Timmy into the well (err, Timmy "fell"... thanks to the magic of editing).

Can a cigarette do that?


Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:20 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 12:50 pm
Posts: 1652
Location: Winona, MN
Post 
rskm1 wrote:
At least Lassie could go get help after she'd pushed Timmy into the well (err, Timmy "fell"... thanks to the magic of editing).

Can a cigarette do that?


No, but it would make that time spent in the well, waiting in the desperate hope that a dog can bring help, go that much smoother.

-"Timmy, are you alright?"
-"Yes, I'm alright, and suddenly I feel so much more mature and cool."


Sun Apr 05, 2009 6:05 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 17, 2006 3:10 pm
Posts: 241
Post 
This thread makes me want a cigarette.

_________________
N=R*FpNpFlFiFcL


Sun Apr 05, 2009 7:54 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post 
i've got something you can smoke.

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Sun Apr 05, 2009 8:22 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2008 11:09 am
Posts: 57
Location: eXistenZ, Level VI
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
In case you smokers missed the latest outrage, loose tobacco and small cigars now also have the shit taxed out of them.

I went to pick up the $15 can of Top I keep around for emergencies, and it was $20-something.

I smoke three packs a day. I'm starting to think weed would be cheaper.

_________________
The decimals of pi are both infinite and random. This means that the set of pi decimals contains every other set, like the entire set of primes. An infinite number of times. When you look at a simple circle, you are gazing into God's secrets.


Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:27 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
let us know if you manage to smoke 3 packs of joints per day.

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:01 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
And how would you remember how many you smoked after you were done?

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Wed Apr 22, 2009 7:13 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 5:48 pm
Posts: 211
Location: MN
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
why you'd be out of rolling papers that's how!
Image

_________________
.:OBCT:.||.:betaEight:.||.:Portfolio:.||.:AlkaloidHouse:.


Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:52 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
That's kinda like thinking "How can there be no money in my bank account? I still have checks!"

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:08 pm
Profile WWW

Joined: Sun May 11, 2003 10:54 am
Posts: 1273
Location: Minne-Hopeless
Post Re:
devil wrote:
But there are some pluses. They satisfy your body's growing addiction to nicotine and...okay I guess there's just that one plus.


can't remember the comedian that said this, but....
Quote:
I feel sorry for people that don't smoke. They have no idea what it's like to want something sooooo bad, ....and get it every time.

_________________
I've shed the baggage of years in hell. Now, I breathe. I am home.


Sat Jul 10, 2010 8:06 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
Rockula! wrote:
That's kinda like thinking "How can there be no money in my bank account? I still have checks!"


That is the best analogy you've ever made. Well played my friend.

~€ther~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:33 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 3:02 pm
Posts: 1893
Location: Minneapolis
Post Re: Re:
can't remember the comedian that said this, but....
Quote:
I feel sorry for people that don't smoke. They have no idea what it's like to want something sooooo bad, ....and get it every time.
[/quote]

That is awesome!

_________________
DJ Nitrogen

Playlists


Thu Jul 22, 2010 12:56 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 2380
Location: Ehr. well. Im not a local
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
I love you guys.

My brand is Camel, by the way. Any of the Turkish blends I love, I also love the Kamel Red.

I tried to quit a while back when I was really broke, and I did okay, then I started to get money again, and I started, now I'm broke again, but have generous friends.

It's fascinating. I guess I never really cared if it effected the later years of my life, they're not, in particular, years I really want to have.

We've been having a lot of anti smoking regulation here, too. You can't smoke inside any public space or building, much like up there, and it's hurt some small businesses that sorta survived by being smoker friendly. I'm not saying it shouldn't happen, it has happened, and I live with it okay, it irks me slightly then I get over it.

I guess it's weird, I feel like I missed an epoch. If I'd been born just ten or fifteen years earlier, I probably coulda smoked in a hospital.

_________________
Mind crunching rage.


Sat Oct 16, 2010 4:42 am
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
Nemphusi wrote:
I guess it's weird, I feel like I missed an epoch. If I'd been born just ten or fifteen years earlier, I probably coulda smoked in a hospital.



Oh yeah?
Try becoming sexually aware during the first AIDS scare
You got to watch people have sex left and right during the 70's and now it is your turn to get some
Only no one wants to touch each other because they are afraid to die
Still think a few measley smoking inconveniences is worse?

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Sat Oct 16, 2010 12:52 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 5056
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
I never once used a condom and I didn't die. I'm no Wilt Chamberlain but I have engaged in sexual congress with a large number of women, protection free. And I never knocked anyone up either. So don't believe the hype.

That being said, the plural of "anecdote" is not "data."


Sat Oct 16, 2010 2:22 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 2380
Location: Ehr. well. Im not a local
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
Well, you live a charmed life, Devil. Maybe they'll play Lucky man at your funeral.

And sex is almost as cool as cigarettes. So it's sorta like, well, you know...

_________________
Mind crunching rage.


Sun Oct 17, 2010 10:01 am
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2008 6:10 am
Posts: 241
Location: a hop skip and a jump away
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
devil wrote:
I never once used a condom and I didn't die. I'm no Wilt Chamberlain but I have engaged in sexual congress with a large number of women, protection free. And I never knocked anyone up either. So don't believe the hype.


Pic or it didn't happen!

_________________
aiisbi
ee
http://www.edentropy.blogspot.com


Tue Oct 26, 2010 7:16 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 07, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3269
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
You can make all the fun you like about my age, but man the '70s sure was a great decade to be a teenager.

Plus, we had quaaludes and lots of cheap and easy to obtain excellent drugs. And no, I don't mean the 1870s.

But cigarettes? Fuck those things. I had my go with them. Never got hooked but will never smoke one again. Useless.


Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:19 am
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
apparently they stave off sleep deprivation in the hardcore mode of fallout new vegas, tho.

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Wed Oct 27, 2010 12:25 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 4917
Location: S St Paul
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
I thought they made a flavor of Mountain Dew specifically for that.


Wed Oct 27, 2010 4:21 pm
Profile
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
devil wrote:
I never once used a condom and I didn't die. I'm no Wilt Chamberlain but I have engaged in sexual congress with a large number of women, protection free. And I never knocked anyone up either. So don't believe the hype.


Ah, the advantages of having a microscopic penis.

~€~

:lol:

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:53 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 1768
Location: Twin Cities
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
zom-zom wrote:
You can make all the fun you like about my age, but man the '70s sure was a great decade to be a teenager.

Plus, we had quaaludes and lots of cheap and easy to obtain excellent drugs.


Yeah, yeah, we know gramps... and movies were just a nickel.

~€~

_________________
regards,

~€ᵀᴴᴲᴿ~



_______________________________________________________
____________________
[color=#FFFF00]________
€₸╠╣≡Ɽ
commercial graphic artist, singer, songwriter, multi-instrumentalist


BACK ALLEY: https://www.facebook.com/backalleysocial
CRUSH COLLECTIVE: http://www.facebook.com/crushmydesign


Wed Oct 27, 2010 5:55 pm
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2003 5:52 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: minneapolis
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
rskm1 wrote:
I thought they made a flavor of Mountain Dew specifically for that.


nuka cola quantum?

_________________
thosquanta: the band!
http://www.thosquanta.com


Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:21 pm
Profile YIM WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
Ether wrote:
devil wrote:
I never once used a condom and I didn't die. I'm no Wilt Chamberlain but I have engaged in sexual congress with a large number of women, protection free. And I never knocked anyone up either. So don't believe the hype.


Ah, the advantages of having a microscopic penis.

~€~

:lol:


DAMN!

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:53 am
Profile WWW
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2002 7:00 pm
Posts: 3128
Location: The center of the universe
Post Re: Okay, so, cigarettes.
Ether wrote:
zom-zom wrote:
You can make all the fun you like about my age, but man the '70s sure was a great decade to be a teenager.

Plus, we had quaaludes and lots of cheap and easy to obtain excellent drugs.


Yeah, yeah, we know gramps... and movies were just a nickel.

~€~


DOUBLE DAMN!
A peanut girl
Alonely little peanut!!!

_________________
I may be an asshole, but I'm not a fucking asshole
R!


Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:00 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 132 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.